Statistics

208,684 members
80,913 posts

Sort

Sort

Discover

  • InactiveUser
    Contributor - Level 2
    2012-08-13
    X32 Feature Request and Issue Reporting Thread | Mixers

    Hello All,

    At the request of Terence Sharp, who posted in the X32 Discussion thread ( http://soundforums.net/junior-varsity/4393-x32-discussion-38.html ) on SoundForums.net, we're setting up this thread to collect feedback from the community on X32 feature requests and issues.

    Please post your comments here and I'll ensure all the right folks at BEHRINGER read them.

    Thanks!
    -Mike

    read more...
    0 139,686
    0
    Mark As Solved 0 Reopen Discussion 0
    • 557 Replies
      Oldest
    • InactiveUser
      NickDavis here are a few feature requests:



      1. GEQ - incorporate option for feedback detection ( not destroyer ).

      2. Compressor - auto release option

      4. re - playback of recorded tracks via usb/fiwi - addition of ability to set markers for the transport start points

      5. re - playback of recorded tracks via usb/fiwi ( or incorporated when the proposed enhancement to allow direct recording to standalone hard disk) - addition of recording automation of all mixing parameters ( selectable) say to the usb stick - This was a feature of the old DDX3216 - and would improve ability to mix otb.
      • August 13, 2012
    • InactiveUser
      InactiveUser Hi,

      my only request is a Deesser! Everything else is just fine
      • August 13, 2012
    • InactiveUser
      KevinHunter To expand a little on Nicks suggestion (no 1)



      Overlay the GEQ on top of a RTA or SMAART (the way the Presonus does) this really helps ringing out feedback.



      Kev
      • August 13, 2012
    • InactiveUser
      DaveKorman or go a little further and have a button that automatically sets the GEQ to the inverse of the RTA display to give a fast starting point to the manually tweak?
      • August 13, 2012
    • InactiveUser
      InactiveUser 1. I'll second the de-esser.

      2. Ability to gang 2 consoles together (x32 + x32, x32 + x16, x16 + x16).

      3. Ability to select inputs in smaller blocks than 8.

      4. Implementation of permissions, particularly for the iPad app. (See StudioLive)

      5. Meter bridge add-on.

      6. Video out that mirrors the console. To me this adds a huge amount of operational redundancy, so that if the screen breaks or gets bashed that I can still use the console. (In a pinch it's easier to add a monitor than come up with a whole computer + software.)

      7. Keyboard and mouse over USB.

      8. Tone generator.
      • August 14, 2012
    • View later comments
  • Behringer
    Triber Moderator
    2020-11-24
    Competition. The Facts. | MIDI Controllers

    Since various magazines and Arturia have publicly called us out over the launch of our Swing MIDI Controller, we would like to respond and share some facts around the principles of competition and clear up some misconceptions.
    

    Competition is a highly effective tool to drive innovation by empowering Customers to make their best choices and force manufacturers to constantly reinvent themselves. Innovation means progress and this happens on many levels, whether it relates to customer experience, functionality or cost efficiencies etc.
    There are 4 established marketing strategies: market leader, market challenger, market follower and market nichers. Here is a great article: https://aytm.com/blog/brand-positioning-for-a-competitive-edge-part-3/
    

    The competition law was designed to avoid companies creating a market monopoly and stifle innovation, which would be detrimental to the rights of the Customers to expect better offerings. The law was specifically designed to encourage everyone to fiercely compete, even when it means over the same functionality and design, provided intellectual property such as utility (functional) and design patents as well as trademarks etc. are respected.
    

    How many Fender Stratocaster or Gibson Les Paul clones are out there in the guitar world and how many SM58 clones are available? How many cars or mobile phones look alike? It is not surprising that Gibson recently lost a substantial legal case trying to prevent others from making V-shape guitars or Fender, who lost all trademark cases related to their Stratocaster design.
    The reason is simple: the law encourages competition and provides maximum freedom for companies to engage head-on, all for the benefit of the Customer.

    We are spending large amounts of resources on innovation, which is reflected in products such as X32, XR18, Flow, DDM4000, etc. This made us the global market leader for analog and digital mixers and over the years we have built an extensive patent portfolio:
    https://community.musictribe.com/pages/intellectual-property
    However, we also clearly choose to follow successful brands and products, while adding more features and/or competing on price. Much of our innovation is invisible to the Customer as it relates to our highly advanced and automated design and manufacturing processes and for that we are spending hundreds of millions of US$.
    For this reason, we have become strategic partners with Microsoft, Siemens, Adobe and many other Tier 1 companies as we are pushing for extreme digitization and automation.
    

    The follower marketing strategy is a very common business model in any industry, which is enabled by law to encourage competition. With our new Swing MIDI Controller, we followed an established concept, but of course wrote our own firmware with added functionality. However, these unique features will only come to life when we launch our free DAW.
    

    The free Music Tribe DAW will form the heart of an incredible eco-system, where all our controllers, synthesizers and drum machines etc. will integrate seamlessly, thus dramatically improve connectivity and workflow. This will make it incredibly easy for our Customers to create, edit and share their music.
    Only our upcoming controllers will feature total integration with our synthesizers, drum machines, digital mixers and other Music Tribe equipment, while also offering standard functionality with all 3rd party products.
    

    For anyone familiar with the industry landscape, Arturia has been cloned for years (Worlde MiniMidi, etc.), while the company has also been “borrowing” from others with their VST replicas of legendary hardware synths, open-source code from Mutable Instruments, the “Expressive Touche” controller or the registration of known “DX7” and “Synthi” marks. Equally, our own analog Xenyx mixers and many other products have been widely cloned.
    ¬We will absolutely continue to deliver innovative products but also follow our competitors as we expect our products to be cloned - fair play.
    

    We are very cautious when it comes to our follower approach and employ expert intellectual property firms to ensure our products stay within the boundaries of the law; we are committed to never intentionally infringe on other companies’ intellectual property.

    Many years ago, we were entangled in bitter lawsuits with Mackie and Pioneer, which we all won. But we also recently lost a case against Yamaha in China related to a simple fader knob design that involved a design patent we were unfortunately not aware of. We changed the design, we will pay the fees and move on. Notably, Yamaha themselves were sued by Dr. Dre over their headphone designs (https://www.cnet.com/news/dr-dre-sues-yamaha-over-headphones/) or entangled in other legal matters (https://www.gov.uk/government/news/musical-instrument-firms-to-pay-millions-after-breaking-competition-law), which clearly shows how competitive business is. The heated Apple versus Samsung disputes are a prime example.
    

    It is our Purpose and Mission to empower Customers who don’t have deep pockets and provide them with the best possible equipment at fair prices. We do understand that we are a fierce competitor and at times controversial as we’re relentlessly push the envelope.
    

    We would like to thank all our Customers who have supported us over the past 30 years. We are absolutely committed to continue to deliver the best possible products at the lowest possible cost.

    read more...
    3 29,735
    0
    Mark As Solved 0 Reopen Discussion 0
    • 14 Replies
      Oldest
    • Behringer
      K-Linerz I dont understand why people are so touchy these days about all this! If there wasnt the competition like we get from yourselves/Behringer we would all be sitting in our studio's either with equipment that has probably crippled our finances, or no equipment priced out by companies like Roland/Korg etc who have done so for years. Its only more recent times where competition is fierce that it pushes the prices down for these companies to fight it out for our money.
      Comments i have seen where people have said " I was going to buy the MonoPoly but after this im not" is absurd. Good luck finding a Mono/Poly at the price point you can buy the Behringer one! - well, maybe if it was just a shell they might.

      Keep going!
      • November 24, 2020
      • Competition. The Facts.
        VarjuLaszlo Roland, Moog deserves his fate, but Korg is a traditional cheap brand, and they producing their classics or something nearly in upgraded version. They producing MS-20, but Behringer made a fake version not for a reasonable price. There are the Minilogue, what is the modern but stil analogue version of MonoPoly, but more CHEAPER then Uli's copy.
        • November 25, 2020
    • Behringer
      snidedj Well, I guess they have a fair point. I wasn't sure whether I supported the cloning of a current piece of hardware so blatantly but they have reminded me how often this happens and how it fairly contributes to competition.
      • November 24, 2020
    • Behringer
      Champ_007 You can thank me with a new UMC1820 that already has issues after a couple months use.
      • November 24, 2020
      • Competition. The Facts.
        Behringer Hey Eric, so sorry to hear that you have issues with your interface. Have you already opened a support ticket to get that sorted out?
        • November 24, 2020
      • Competition. The Facts.
        Champ_007 Nope. Goes back to the store and will buy from another brand that´s more reliable. Great interface if it weren´t for those poor components.
        • 1
        • ·
        • November 24, 2020
      • Competition. The Facts.
        LionBird12 You did the right thing. Eric. Behringer does not deserve our dollars right now.
        • November 24, 2020
      • Competition. The Facts.
        K-Linerz Had my UMC1820 for the last year and had zero issues. Even expanded with their ADAT and the UMC1820 runs smooth with all 16 channels simultaneously.
        • November 24, 2020
      • Competition. The Facts.
        LionBird12 Hey Behringer, you suck right now. Your You tube page for the product says it all. Thousands of negative comments and shit you deserve. Fix this crap and take the product off market you A holes. Pathetic Response this is!
        • November 25, 2020
    • Behringer
      jschussler The question most are asking isn’t “is it legal,” it’s “is it necessary?” You could have designed a very similar product without making it an exact copy and still had a successful offering. Cloning so directly comes off as lazy. Why didn’t you modify the physical design in any way? You have the capability....
      • November 24, 2020
      • Competition. The Facts.
        mp4n4 Who cares, copying a product is much cheaper than actually developing one. Also, this could be an entry for Behringer in a new sub-market so they prolly don't wanna spend too much. Moreover, keystep 32 costs the same amount of money, so this is not competitively priced and the market will show whether this will be a successful product or not. To me, lazy, is when you can't put a good encoder knob on your product (Arturia Beatstep Pro) and you sell it at high price. We have a free market, you only hear about products that are better sold to you, or with better marketing and not necesarilly "unique". I really do not care about whether Behringer copies products or not, these are tools for creativity and not football teams so no one should be a fanboy really, they're asking for your money and you hope they give you the best value for it back and thats about it. Keep going Behringer and any other company that clones stuff..
        • November 24, 2020
      • Competition. The Facts.
        jschussler "Who cares"

        Lots of people care, hence the controversy.
        • November 24, 2020
    • Behringer
      TravisSpore Wow! That is some twisted thinking. Returning the couple things I just purchased--they just became "defective" weird right? And cancelled the modules I had on pre-order. What a disgusting way to do business.
      • November 24, 2020
    • View later comments
  • InactiveUser
    Contributor - Level 2
    2012-08-29
    X32 compatible with Waves Multirack software?? | Mixers
    Hi:
    I just bought the Berhringer X32 and have been trying to connect Waves Multirack software via USB to the XUF FireWire/USB audio interface card. My hopes are to be able to run all the audio inputs during live performance through the Multirack software and back into the X32. I have had some success but have not yet found a "routing" combination that has completely worked. Has anyone tried and done this successfully??
    I am new the forum and would appreciate any thoughts.
    Best,
    Hoyt
    read more...
    0 11,460
    0
    Mark As Solved 0 Reopen Discussion 0
    • 15 Replies
      Oldest
    • InactiveUser
      InactiveUser I don't own a X32 yet but I have contacted Behringer and Waves about this and both said it would work. I would contact Waves becuase they were willing to walk me through it. If you e-mail them they will contact you back fast. They have the best customer service I have found anywhere.
      • August 30, 2012
    • InactiveUser
      InactiveUser Thanks, Yes I have spoken Waves and they do not know. No one at Sweetwater or Guitar Center in LA knows the answer either. I just got my mixer and I am having success with adding only 4 channels of AUX 1-4 which is only one of the inputs directly into the onboard audio card. I am trying other combinations to see if I can come up with another combination of routing that will allow me more Wave channels. I will let you know what I find.



      Thanks,

      Hoyt
      • August 30, 2012
    • InactiveUser
      ChristianBoche Hi,

      by now it is a bit clumsy, because the daw returns are not useable as digital inserts on all channel without sacrifying the micpres. You can use the Aux inptus though. Behringer R&D is working on a solution as we speak, this routing option will come in a future firmware update. I'm also waiting on this, we just need a bit more patience.

      Christian
      • August 30, 2012
    • InactiveUser
      OzzyStone

      Christian Boche;480 wrote:

      Hi,

      by now it is a bit clumsy, because the daw returns are not useable as digital inserts on all channel without sacrifying the micpres. You can use the Aux inptus though. Behringer R&D is working on a solution as we speak, this routing option will come in a future firmware update. I'm also waiting on this, we just need a bit more patience.

      Christian




      hi any idea if there is a workaround this?

      I use multirack on every show with my personus

      I want to buy a X32 and will hate to use my plugins
      • January 12, 2013
    • InactiveUser
      PerSovik

      hyeatman;467 wrote:

      Hi:

      I just bought the Berhringer X32 and have been trying to connect Waves Multirack software via USB to the XUF FireWire/USB audio interface card. My hopes are to be able to run all the audio inputs during live performance through the Multirack software and back into the X32. I have had some success but have not yet found a "routing" combination that has completely worked. Has anyone tried and done this successfully??

      I am new the forum and would appreciate any thoughts.

      Best,

      Hoyt




      As long as you want to set up as insert on every channel, it is quite straightforward. If you route Card out to use Local 1-8, 9-16, 17-24 & 25-32 and route Inputs to use Card as source, you have insert on all your channels. You have to do any bypass in Multirack, and all channels have to have a path trough Multirack, but the X32 side is fairly straightforward if you can live with having permanent inserts.



      One question for you, does the Multirack support non-Waves plugins, I have a couple of Waves bundles and would like to use them if that doesn't limit me to Waves-only.
      • January 13, 2013
    • View later comments
  • InactiveUser
    Contributor - Level 2
    2012-10-02
    DAW for the X32 | Mixers
    What is the best DAW to use with the X32?? And why not some kind of software wasn't supplied with the board. You figure for the price we paid, something would of been nice.
    0 10,779
    0
    Mark As Solved 0 Reopen Discussion 0
    • 9 Replies
      Oldest
    • InactiveUser
      ChristianBoche I spend a lot of time in studios and therefore I need to know how to operate the most common audio sequenzer. Sadly I just have only very basic skills in Logic and ProTools, but I'm quite good with SawStudio, Cubase&Nuendo, StudioOne and Reaper. I found StudioOne runs nicely with the X32 (both Mac and PC), but it is not that stable in comparison to reaper or SAW. Just my personal experience. So, if you need a sequencer just for studio work, maybe look into Studio One. There is even a complety free version--> http://studioone.presonus.com/free



      If you want to do live recordings, I would go with Reaper! Very stable, nice price and it comes with some important features for live recordings. F.e. you can record your tracks to two differnet paths and you have the option, to record in BradcastWave (wav.64) files. No need to worry about the 4GB file limit (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WAV#Limitations).



      Hope that helps.

      Christian
      • November 1, 2012
    • InactiveUser
      HenryKlein I use to work with Presonus' Studio One as well, works really nice and it's worth thinking about buying the full version. You can dig into the system with the free version.



      As was a Samplitude user for more than 15 years (before switching to Mac) I would recommend that DAW, too.



      What you will need to manage on your system is a routing setup that differs from DAW to DAW. Most systems can manage templates that are easy to use once they're made. Always remember to start the DAW AFTER the hardware is plugged and seen by your computer.



      Henry
      • November 2, 2012
    • InactiveUser
      InactiveUser

      Christian Boche;1058 wrote:



      I found StudioOne runs nicely with the X32 (both Mac and PC), but it is not that stable in comparison to reaper or SAW.




      Care to elaborate?
      • November 7, 2012
    • InactiveUser
      ChristianBoche

      Roblof;1141 wrote:

      Care to elaborate?




      Sure. Studio One crashes once in a while, when working with applications that uses lot's of RAM (samples, drumagog) and especially with the build in Melodyne. The 64bit version of S1 works notably better than the 32bit version concerning this topic. It never crashed, when I was just recording...but be careful when doing serious editing and mixing. I have one reaper rig as well, that never crashed within the last three years and I know two guys using reaper for doing live sound (like SAC).

      Just sayin'



      Christian



      When a rock solid live tracking behavior is on the wish list, than maybe look into Nuendo Live-->

      http://www.steinberg.net/en/products/nuendo/nuendo_live.html

      It can restore even unsaved recordings after a power out! BTW: SAWstudio can fix a damaged header too...
      • November 8, 2012
    • InactiveUser
      AlanBean I do not yet own an X32, but am doing the research to confirm whether or not to buy. I am considering it for one purpose: to mix live shows and record at the same time. I have MacBook Pro i7 with 16 GB RAM and a Glyph Firewire 800 external drive. On the Mac I am running Pro Tools 9 using Windows 7 via Bootcamp (long story why not the Mac OS...). My glyph drive uses the only Firewire port on the Mac. Can I really record 32 tracks at once via USB from the X32 without dropouts? I have no desire to do any manipulation in the DAW during the show. I will be focusing on live mixing for FOH and will mix the recorded show later back in my Pro Tools HD studio.

      Is anyone recording to Pro Tools with this console successfully?

      This board looks almost too good to be true for the price. I have had a couple of Behringer items break down in the past...reliability means a lot when recording live shows for a client!
      • November 14, 2012
    • View later comments
  • BobHarvey
    Contributor - Level 2
    2012-08-22
    Travel Case for the X32 ? | Mixers
    Have any of you early adopters located a case for the X32?

    I corresponded with Gator last month and they seemed oblivious to the wave of X32s that's about to come ashore.

    Our friends across the pond are getting a nice case from Thomann, but shipping from GB would be a bit much!

    http://www.thomann.de/gb/thon_case_behringer_x_32.htm

    Partick Ferdig, VP, CARE - MUSIC Group Services US Inc., is checking with product management to see what he can find out regarding a flite case for the X32.

    Thanks ...
    read more...
    0 9,024
    0
    Mark As Solved 0 Reopen Discussion 0
  • InactiveUser
    Contributor - Level 2
    2012-08-14
    Line level input to X32? | Mixers
    OK, I am a bit unclear about hooking up line level (keyboards and effects) to the X32... in the Sound on Sound review it said the impedance was 12k? input impedance and would accept line level.

    In the Sonic Lab video review it was mentioned a DI Box was required...

    So, should a simple XLR - TRS snake be enough to connect the X32 directly to line level instruments?

    Thanks
    JK
    read more...
    0 7,829
    0
    Mark As Solved 0 Reopen Discussion 0
    • 10 Replies
      Oldest
    • InactiveUser
      ChrisPainter

      ripe;363 wrote:

      OK, I am a bit unclear about hooking up line level (keyboards and effects) to the X32... in the Sound on Sound review it said the impedance was 12k? input impedance and would accept line level.



      In the Sonic Lab video review it was mentioned a DI Box was required...



      So, should a simple XLR - TRS snake be enough to connect the X32 directly to line level instruments?



      Thanks

      JK




      Hello,



      A DI box is not required if the source is balanced. Ultimately, you should be able to connect from balanced line sources directly to the X32 with no problems, because the X32 has a really wide gain range. However, you'll find the gain controls on the X32 will be set very low.



      For the best possible results we still recommend using DI's, because they use balancing transformers. This would be especially important if your going long cable lengths, such as through a 150 ft snake for example.



      Keep in mind, you always have the 6 AUX line inputs as well on the X32. Not sure how many keyboard sources you have, but there's 6 line channels available. These can be balanced or unbalanced sources.





      I hope this helps!



      Chris Painter

      Specialist, Product Support

      MUSIC Group

      BEHRINGER
      • November 15, 2012
    • InactiveUser
      jenkinsj

      Chris Painter;1258 wrote:





      you always have the 6 AUX line inputs as well on the X32. ...but there's 6 stereo line channels available.




      Can you clarify this? I thought there were 6 mono AUX line inputs which you could use as 3 stereo pairs. Are there some more somewhere?



      James
      • November 15, 2012
    • InactiveUser
      ChrisPainter

      jenkinsj;1271 wrote:

      Can you clarify this? I thought there were 6 mono AUX line inputs which you could use as 3 stereo pairs. Are there some more somewhere?



      James




      James,



      Besides the 32 XLR mic inputs on the back, you also have six 1/4" line level inputs. These do not have the Midas designed microphone preamps like the other 32 channels. They are designed for signals that are already line level. If the keyboards are near the X32, this might be an additional solution for interconnecting your keyboards.





      Chris Painter

      Specialist, Product Support

      MUSIC Group

      BEHRINGER
      • November 16, 2012
    • InactiveUser
      InactiveUser

      jenkinsj;1271 wrote:

      Can you clarify this? I thought there were 6 mono AUX line inputs which you could use as 3 stereo pairs. Are there some more somewhere?



      James




      No you're not missing anything, there are 6 MONO TRS inputs and 6 MONO TRS outputs. These are limited function line level only, (no mic pre) with eq but no dynamics.
      • November 23, 2012
    • InactiveUser
      jenkinsj So, that doesn't imply 6 stereo line channels. As I thought, there are 6 mono line channels or 3 stereo pairs using the AUX connections.





      Keep in mind, you always have the 6 AUX line inputs as well on the X32. Not sure how many keyboard sources you have, but there's 6 stereo line channels available.




      Where are the other 3?
      • November 24, 2012
    • View later comments
  • TC-James
    Triber Moderator
    2019-06-14
    Flashback 2 Delay TAP TEMPO firmware update! | Guitar and Bass

    CALLING ALL FLASHBACK 2 USERS!

    Thanks to your extensive feedback, we have developed a new firmware update for the Flashback 2 and we are NOW SEARCHING FOR BETA TESTERS!

    The update gives users the option of having TAP TEMPO as the secondary footswitch function and true stereo input instead of MASH.

    After updating to firmware V1.2.00, you can toggle between MASH and TAP TEMPO as a global setting for your Flashback 2 in the TonePrint App.

    Press and hold the footswitch for 1.5 seconds to activate TAP TEMPO control (power LED turns green), then tap the footswitch in sync with your desired tempo to adjust delay times accordingly.

    When TAP TEMPO is selected from the TonePrint App the MASH LED will constantly flash to display 1/4 note tempo of the delays, even when the pedal is turned off so you can always tell if you're on time.

    The firmware update also fixes a small bug regarding stereo summing in buffered bypass mode when using stereo output.

    If you own a Flashback 2 and you'd like to help us beta test firmware V1.2.00, please contact us :

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Hi all, 1.2.00 firmware is now officially released and can be downloaded on the TC website:
    https://www.tcelectronic.com/Categories/Tcelectronic/Guitar/Stompboxes/FLASHBACK-2-DELAY/p/P0CKR/Downloads#googtrans(en|en)

    Thanks for all the help and feedback. With best regards,  Mike  TC electronic 

    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    read more...
    5 6,927
    0
    Mark As Solved 0 Reopen Discussion 0
    • 47 Replies
      Oldest
    • TC-James
      TC-Mike

      This is how you disable MASH switch to activate the TAP tempo feature on the new 1.2.00 firmware:



      • Connect you Fb2 pedal to your computer or mobile device

      • Start the Toneprint app 

      • Select the Flashback 2 in the Templates view:
        flashback 2 beta disable mash1.PNG

      • Select any template from the list and click on the pencil icon to edit it 
        fb2 diable mash 2.PNG

      • click on the Product Settings tab and then on the MASH switch lever as seen in the screenshot

      • fb2 product settings.PNG

      • you have now disabled MASH switch functionality and the MASH LED should no blink and indicate the current delay time

      • the setting is remmebered until you enable  MASH again 
      • June 13, 2019
    • TC-James
      APG247

      I own a TC Electronic Nova Delay and love the hold tap tempo feature where you can hold down the tap tempo button, play a rhythm and the pedal listens to the tempo you play and matches it. Will that feature be available on the Flashback 2?
      • June 25, 2019
    • TC-James
      gmobbs

      Hi TC-James,...Just read about the FB2 firmware update that enables tap tempo in lieu of MASH.  That's a great trade-off in my book, and I'd really like to be included in the beta-testing on this new firmware.  What's the proceedure for getting involved?  Thanks!


      George (Seattle, WA)  425-922-8688


       
      • July 25, 2019
    • TC-James
      rushrn61

      Hi,


      Please send me the Firmware V1.2.00 update for TAP TEMPO secondary function on the Flashback 2


      Thank you in advance,


      Randy
      • July 27, 2019
    • TC-James
      countach74

      I'd like to try the firmware as well.
      • July 29, 2019
    • View later comments
  • InactiveUser
    Contributor - Level 2
    2012-08-26
    Platform to share X32 presets | Mixers
    Hi,

    it would be nice to have corner in this forums (perhaps even some kind of database), where it is possible to share presets for FX, EQ, dynamics etc.

    thanks
    Blechi
    0 5,933
    0
    Mark As Solved 0 Reopen Discussion 0
    • 8 Replies
      Oldest
    • InactiveUser
      JasonNowka I agree!
      • August 28, 2012
    • InactiveUser
      InactiveUser I agree !!!
      • September 2, 2012
    • InactiveUser
      InactiveUser It would be cool !!!
      • November 26, 2012
    • InactiveUser
      KevinHunter

      blechi;436 wrote:

      Hi,



      it would be nice to have corner in this forums (perhaps even some kind of database), where it is possible to share presets for FX, EQ, dynamics etc.



      thanks

      Blechi




      If behringer doesn't want to do this then www.x32user.net is already set up for this purpose



      Kev
      • November 26, 2012
    • InactiveUser
      JürgenKirkovits

      starstruck;1473 wrote:

      If behringer doesn't want to do this then www.x32user.net is already set up for this purpose



      Kev




      It just seems that noone wants to upload anything, not even the site administrator. The only preset that is online just initializes the console, and I wouldn't waste a scene slot for that one when I just need to go into the Setup menu.
      • November 27, 2012
    • View later comments
  • JanDuwe
    Triber
    2019-11-13
    X32 Firmware 4.0 | Mixers

    Dear X32 fellows,
    We have just released v4.0, a major update to the X32 series firmware and the EDIT desktop apps.

    All updates are online now, webpages are being updated currently, and it may take a little while until it is properly reflected on web server caches.For those who can't wait to check it out here are the download links, and a link to Goetz' fantastic 3:42 minutes of info on youtube
     
    If you prefer the old layout, you may of course keep using fw 3.12 with EDIT apps 3.2. But you will miss the many really cool features like point-to-point routing and remote configuration of Midas' recent DP48 monitoring system etc. etc.

    See the download links below and have fun as much as we had over the past months creating the new UI. Big kudos to Adam, Andreina, Brunella, Martin, Michael and Thomas for making this possible, and of course to the beta-team for much valued comments!!!

    Best regards,
    Jan
     
    read more...
    6 5,807
    0
    Mark As Solved 0 Reopen Discussion 0
    • 29 Replies
      Oldest
    • JanDuwe
      MarshallH

      We just uploaded it to a few displays in our retail store. Looks really good! I can't wait to play around with the new patch routing. 


      Stagesound.com
      • November 13, 2019
    • JanDuwe
      GaryHiggins

      Updated my M32 and Core so far...very happy about Core/M32C being able to export shows!....long time coming. I don't see a specific area for the DP48 setup, in edit anyway, did I miss it? Love the user in/out routing sections, extremely powerful. Only can guess at the possibilities. Great work all! 
      • November 13, 2019
    • JanDuwe
      Paul_Vannatto

      @GaryHiggins wrote:


      I don't see a specific area for the DP48 setup, in edit anyway, did I miss it?  




      No you didn't miss it. The editor doesn't have it yet. But the firmware does, meaning you can access it from one of the other (non-core) X32/M32 models interface. I have Scene Parser almost ready for release and hoping to provide a DP48 tool in Live Toolbox in the near future (yes you can access it via OSC). 


       
      • November 13, 2019
    • JanDuwe
      PerHeldal

      I get 404 when trying to download some of the files (X-Edit Linux 32-bit, and RPI)
      • November 13, 2019
    • JanDuwe
      FelixHomann

      Hi Jan,


      can we hope for some "firmware love" for the X Air/ M Air mixers, too, now that the X32 v4 has been done? You once mentioned that internally some of the most wanted features have already been implemented and you just didn't have the resources to update the apps as well. That would be highly appreciated  
      • November 13, 2019
    • View later comments
  • nixx
    Super Contributor - Level 2
    2019-09-06
    TC Electronic Konnekt and macOS Catalina (64-bit support) | Studio Controllers and Meters

    It seems that if TC Electronic won't update their TC Near software, all users of Konnekt (and Impact Twin) audio interfaces are out of luck and won't be able to use their hardware with the upcoming version of macOS. If I'm not mistaken, macOS Catalina will support only 64-bit apps - and TC Near Control Panel is 32-bit

    Is there any chance TC Electronic will update TC Near to support for 64-bit only operating systems? It would be a shame to have all those killer audio interfaces bricked...

    read more...
    10 5,342
    0
    Mark As Solved 0 Reopen Discussion 0
    • 16 Replies
      Oldest
    • nixx
      yann_

      I agree. but it seems they are not involved in this forum at all. 


      I think it's more for users, cause if you check most posts don't even get replies, sometimes if ure lucky a user will help you out but Tc's staff have not seen em around. 
      • October 3, 2019
    • nixx
      lello88 

      Hello, updated yesterday to OSX Catalina, my  Impact Twin unfortunately does not work, I sent an email to the support, I hope to receive an email from the support, greetings

       
      • October 10, 2019
    • nixx
      LB

      I own a Studio Konnekt 48 and I really love that interface. It is perfect for my recording needs, sounds great and has reasonable latencies. 


      It is a real shame, that TC Electronics don't support this fairly new product. In a time where everybody's talking about the environment and saving resources, it just doesn't seem right that I have to throw away a perfectly good (great actually...) audio interface, just because I wish to upgrade the software on my Mac. 


      Next time I buy an audio product I guess I will spend some time checking out the "end of life" policies of the manufaturer. The software support should last at least as long as the life expectancy of the hardware product.


      I always thought of TC Electronics as a serious and trustworthy manufacturer, but this time you have really let me down...


       


       
      • October 14, 2019
    • nixx
      LB

      I wonder if TC even exits anymore, after they have been ackquired by Behringer.. 
      • November 25, 2019
    • nixx
      hakanbahadir

      I have the same problem, luckily I was the Beta tester of Catalina and could be able to turn back to previous version. I can not use Catalina just because of this hardware and it is not acceptable.


      TC please answer us with a solution.


      Hakan
      • December 12, 2019
    • View later comments
Go to page