Behringer

Behringer

Brand

Behringer

224,004 members
98,261 posts
  • New
    NebulaBlack01
    Newcomer - Level 1
    2021-04-14

    I see an LCD on it in the images of it. Does it have digital patch memory?

    0 1
  • New
    LittleBearNoise
    Newcomer - Level 2
    2021-04-14

    Hi, I have a couple of questions, I use Cubase Pro 10.5 and the full version of XTouch:

    1. Does the Xtouch editor work with XTouch or only X-touch One / compact etc? 

    2. How do I activate the use of the footswitch (1/4") to punch in/out? In other responses it has been noted that other units (one / compact) need to be placed into midi mode in order to work. This would remove the normal cubase compatibility functions under the MC protocol which I wish to retain. 

    3. When selecting a bank of 8 channels which are not displayed on-screen (if there are a large number of channels) using the fader bank function on the XTouch, the screen in Cubase does not follow the selection of the next bank without pressing the select button for the last channel in the new bank of 8. When it is pressed the next bank of 8 channels come in to view. Is there a way to edit the function of the XTouch so that the view in Cubase follows the selection of the new bank on the XTouch?

    4. When scrolling through the plug in list using the rotary encoder (plug-in button selected) the list jumps through plug-ins in groups of 4 or 5, this means that many plugins are not selectable from the XTouch plug in settings. Is there a way to make the encoder scroll through the plugins one by one?

    5. The Xtouch One has overlay templates showing the different button assignments for different DAWs is this available for the XTouch?

    Kind regards

     

    read more...
    0 4
    • LittleBearNoise
      DaveMorrison For Questions 1-4: The X-Touch is not programmable. It's a clone of a Mackie Control (plus a mode to connect to X/M mixers). The buttons and controls have fixed MIDI note/controller assignments and can't be changed. The DAW, in your cases Cubase, has to act on the information that it receives (and also sends). Everything is controlled/configured by Cubase. You'll probably have better luck by going to the Cubase forum and search for MCU.
      Question 5. Yes, templates have been made by third party suppliers. There are links to them somewhere in the bowels of this forum. I haven't had any luck searching for them (it's one of the many problems with this forum/site/disaster area ; ) ).
      • 2 hours ago
  • New
    AaronPlant
    Contributor - Level 2
    2021-04-14

    Hello all,

    Quick and hopefully simple question... Can Ultranet be connected via a standard Ethernet network switch somehow?

    I am trying to simplify the number of network devices in my setup as I am now networking my X32 Rack, X-Touch, MacBook, and S32 interface using CAT-6 cables - so I'm just wondering what would happen if some of these devices sat on the same network switch before reaching the other end into the devices... I think AES50 can travel through a standard Ethernet switch... not sure about Ultranet?

    Any advice you have would be very much appreciated :)

    Thanks, Aaron.

    read more...
    0 14
    • AaronPlant
      Nigel67 Hi Aaron. Unfortunately, even though it uses the same cables, it will not work over ethernet
      • 8 hours ago
    • AaronPlant
      AaronPlant

      Hello Nigel, do you mean ANY of it, or is some of it possible with standard network switches? Obviously the X-Touch and X32 Rack are already networked, but it was the AES50 and Ultranet I was hoping to consolidate. I found an article online that said AES50 was Ethernet compatible, so maybe it is the Ultranet that isn't? I guess that would explain the Behringer P16-D switch...?

      • 8 hours ago
    • AaronPlant
      GaryHiggins Aes50 will not work on a network switch, you need bidirectional communications for sync so no way to have multiple returns go down one input line. Ultranet doesn’t use all data pairs of a lan cable but is ethernet cable compatible, it’s a proprietary format. You do need a P16D for Ultranet, or an SD8/16 which have multiple p16 ports.
      • 8 hours ago
    • AaronPlant
      AaronPlant

      Hi again Gary :) - thanks for clarifying this - there's nothing Behringer-specific I could find on the internet regarding this so it is good to know and I note the lack of Ultranet ports on the S32 which is a shame. I'll see about getting hold of a P16D for the Ultranet connectivity then :) I'm also using the Turbosound NuQ tops and subs via Ultranet on top of all the above equipment, hence the question :)

      • 7 hours ago
      • Ultranet over standard Ethernet switch?
        Paul_Vannatto Hi Aaron, I just checked and the S32 does have an Ultranet port, similar to the S16. If you are looking for a stagebox with multiple Ultranet ports, consider getting the SD16 or S8 which have 4 and 2 ports respectively. I find that using multiple SD stageboxes strategically placed on the stage superior to using an all-in-one stagebox.

        Regarding the question of the ethernet compatibility of the AES50 and Ultranet, both are only first layer (physical) compatible of the ethernet protocol. Otherwise both AES50 and Ultranet protocols are proprietary to Klark Teknik (which is part of the MT family).
        • 7 hours ago
      • Ultranet over standard Ethernet switch?
        GaryHiggins Also with an S/DL16/32 stageboxes, they all have adat ports (which output aes50 17-32) you could get a P16i which connects by adat (also analog) and has multiple (5) powered p16 output ports. Whatever you assign aes50 17-32 will be output on the p16i Ultranet ports. For your speakers or p16m’s. They all still have a single Ultranet port besides adat.
        • 1 hour ago
    • AaronPlant
      Nigel67

      Hi Aaron, sorry for the late reply. I see Gary and Paul have already answered your questions though. Everything they have said is exactly right.

      • 6 hours ago
  • New
    PerHeldal
    Valued Contributor - Level 2
    2021-04-14

    Why is it that Behringer/MusicTribe seem to insist on categorising all online-communications by market? Don't you care at all about consumers who already own your products? The "tribe-concept" seem entirely focused on marketing and is worthless for product support. It is as if the company is trying to discourage communications between users. Instead you should facilitate communications to support customer self-service. This new website has now been in production for a couple years, and despite promises made it has not improved in any significant way. As implemented performance is dismal, and functionality even worse. Experienced users struggle to find relevant information and new users often give up. There are alternative sources to information such as facebook-groups and 3rd-party forums, but the corporate online-support for MusicTribe products is now widely considered to be non-existing with the exception of downloads for software and documentation. For tech-support the old simple forum categorised by product-family was vastly superior. As more and more local shops close and busness move online it gets harder to get assistance locally. With my 30+ years of experience from IT and networking I simply don't understand how your corporate management has been able to ignore this problem for so long. I would have been fired within a week if I had implemented such a disaster of a website for a client without an immediate fix or rolling back to a working solution. Every visit to this website for information is turning me off MT-products.

    PS! As the community discussion (what should have been a proper forum) doesn't offer a "general" category I have put this request in a category that is relevant to my needs.

    read more...
    3 14
    • PerHeldal
      AaronPlant Having read your post, with all due respect- I am slightly bewildered to be honest, as I have always found this web site a great help. Users have always been very willing to offer help, and often I get the answers I need without having to go direct to the manufacturer for support. I realise that this may not always work, but I would guess that for the majority of users, the answers are usually forthcoming. Clearly you have had a bad experience, and we all know how frustrating it is when you can't get the answers you need, but it might be a little harsh to say that the web site is useless... things can always be improved for sure, but other than this site being somewhat slower to load, I really can't say that I've had any bad experiences.
      • 9 hours ago
    • PerHeldal
      Paul_Vannatto Hi Aaron, Per does have a point. In spite of the fact that there are so many things wrong to this new forum interface, there are a few of us still sticking it out trying to help answer questions and providing solutions. Unfortunately we have lost many of our seasoned user/members that provided such a wealth of insight and experience. On the flip side, we have gained an increasing amount of MT staff support, which we are grateful for.
      • 4 hours ago
  • New
    Disgrunt
    Newcomer - Level 1
    2021-04-14

    Hi everyone,

    I was wondering if anyone knows how I can track a delivery to Australia of Behringer KM750?

    My music store took my order in November 2020 and then said the unit was not available in Australia and they were awaiting delivery from China which was delayed due to political issues and COVID. Which all sounded reasonable.

    They said it would be delivered by end of December. This then got blown out to end of January. Then Feb etc. Today I got an email saying Behringer now wouldn't give any ETA at all.

    Can anybody help with this? Maybe how to track it down?Has anybody in Australia had a delivery since Novemeber or December come in?

    Thanks for your time.

    read more...
    0 4
  • New
    Mike7300
    Newcomer - Level 1
    2021-04-14

    Can someone explain how to best use two subwoofers as far as which channels I should plug them into and how to get only the bass and kick drum to go through them? And also how to best manage their level compared with the mains?

    Thus far I've only been using two PA speakers but would like to add subs under those speakers at some point.

     

     

    read more...
    0 6
    • Mike7300
      GaryHiggins One way. In your outputs 1-16 routing menu select one and assign it to MC (mono/center.) I might suggest number 6 as Main L/R use 7 and 8 and they will then all be in order 6-8. Now your XLR out #6 (if left at the default setting) will carry whatever you assign to the mono ch. Any ch's that will require sub frequencies like Kick and Bass need to be assigned to the Mono bus which is done in that particular chs Main out section (where L/R is also assigned). You then have the option of not sending those ch's to Main L/R. I usually keep both selected as there are other frequencies I like to tweak in some types of low frequency ch's. Also in the mixer setup section, select "M/C depends on main L/R" and the Mono out fader will be tied to Main L/R and auto adjusted based on the fader position of the mains. You can daisy chain XLR's from one sub to the other to connect both to output 6 (or whichever you selected) It will take some experimentation to get the right level at first to output to the subs, but you will get it easily enough.
      • 11 hours ago
    • Mike7300
      Mike7300

      Thanks. Do the TRS outs work ok for in ear monitors? Right now I have someone using outs 5 and 6 for in ears so I would need to re-assign. Otherwise I’ll need to get an SD 8
      • 8 hours ago
      • Using subwoofers with X32 Rack
        GaryHiggins Yes they do work, but you don’t need to use xlr 6, I suggested that just to make it somewhat organized, meaning all your mains outputs are together...but you say which one is used for Mono/C . Could be any unused bus, in your case 1 thru 4 I guess. Could also drive the subs from the aux out if you need to.
        • 7 hours ago
  • New
    Ndb9
    Newcomer - Level 1
    2021-04-13

    Hello,

    thanks for reading. I'm working with an iPad pro 3rd gen os14.4.2 and using X-AIR and M32-Mix apps. I'm using m-Air-18 mixer, and x-32, m-32 etc. I've also used a few different network routers to connect, and even used the local access WiFi built on board. Standing well within range of the router I'm experiencing lag and freezes that make mixing nearly impossible. It's happened several times with different setups, the only constant factor has been the iPad and software. 

    I have a vpn app installed on my pad but always disable it before connecting to the mixer. Could this or other installed apps be interfereing? Are there any behringer approved routers that could be relied on?

     

    any advice much appreciated. Thanks

    read more...
    0 5
    • Ndb9
      RexBeckett Hi Ndb9, have you tried using a router that supports the 802.11ac Wifi standard? This type of 5GHz Wifi is much more resistant to interference than any of the 2.4GHz modes. The iPad Pro 3rd Gen supports 802.11ac Wifi.
      • 10 hours ago
    • Ndb9
      Ndb9 Update: just called apple, they said it’s likely something to do with the app software, so I deleted the app and reinstalled. However I noticed that many people have reviewed the app from the App Store negatively siting similar issues to mine ever since iOS 13. Now that I’m on iOS 14 I wonder if this is my issue... are there any behringer support lines I can discuss this with? Am I S.O.L for my gigs this summer ?
      • 4 hours ago
      • X-AIR app frequently freezing lagging
        RexBeckett You could always try Mixing Station iOS version. It requires a small one-time payment but is very well supported and gets frequent updates for user-requested features. For more information, see: https://dev-core.org/ms-docs/feature-list/
        • 3 hours ago
  • New
    TravisBDE10
    Newcomer - Level 1
    2021-04-13

    My MonoPoly when arpeggiator is set to FULL goes out of tune: when it gets to the top of the scale it turns into low loud out of tune notes.  Is this normal? It's as if it hits a wall after hitting perfectly in tune notes they get too high, at which point they turn into the lowest scale & a note off.

    read more...
    0 6
    • TravisBDE10
      NicJonesMT Hi Travis. Could you please submit a tech support ticket and we can go through some trouble shooting with you and advise you further. Thank you :)
      • 8 hours ago
  • New
    Steelewolf
    Newcomer - Level 1
    2021-04-13

    Hi,

    I just got a new USB drive for use with my X32 Rack, but it only supports NTFS and exFAT file systems. I saw on the Behringer Wiki, linked here that the 2-track recording works with FAT12, FAT16, and FAT32 formatted drives. My question here then is, can I use an exFAT formatted drive with my X32 console?

    Thanks

    read more...
    0 6
    • Steelewolf
      Paul_Vannatto No, the X32 only support the FAT32 (as well as the older FAT16 and FAT12). The recorder/playback is meant to be used with a USB stick, not a drive
      • Tue at 2:46 PM
  • BarryWoodward
    Newcomer - Level 1
    2021-04-13

    All of the ie amps that I purchased new are only working in the left channel.   I have try 3 different ei phones and thet are all the same. 

    0 5
    • BarryWoodward
      GaryHiggins There is a switch inside by battery to change from mono to stereo, likely they may be set to mono
      • Tue at 12:22 PM
    • BarryWoodward
      StephenEvans I'd bet it's the other way round, that it is set to stereo and you're feeding it from a mono output
      • 6 hours ago
Go to page