Behringer

Hello all,

I bought a behringer wing mixing console for my local church from thomann and we recieved one with ghoust touches.

We returned and they sent another brand new one with the same problem.

We returned again for replacemend and we specified to be tested before sending and we discribed the procedure on how to be tested (install newest firmware version and start console in test mode).

We recived a "tested" console (the package was resealed with thommand branded tape so for shure they opened the package) and the same problem as before. (the ony difference was the position of the ghoust thouches)

My question is how to proceed to get a good console? Should I open a ticket here at music tribe?

Does anyone buyed a good console from thomann?

Need Help ! Ultraner Behringer X32 for P16M issue

Ultranet for P-16m behringer X32 problem

Need advice, im very new for this,
Really need help for me and my church

I have behringer x32 on my church..
One day suddently P-16m wont make any sound..

My route :
X32 ultranet - P16d - P16M

P16M turn on without power adaptor, but no signal sent.

i try to :
X32 ultraner - P16M (with power adaptor)

its same, p16M on, but no signal sent here..

*i already setting the ultranet p-16m per channel output.. in ultranet pages..

Please help me ?

Good day all, does any know how to assign a channel post fader to the ducker. I do know how to assign and set up the channels but even with the mute on and fader closed ducking is still active on the channel. Can anyone help or is this for Behringer to address with firmware. Thank you for your help on the matter

I'm a big fan of the Wing-Q app, I like that it is super obvious and easy to use. My only issue, is I am about to try and explain to some older folk how to use the app, and on a normal phone, the channel names are tiny! I'm not sure anyone will be able to read it... 

What I was wondering, is whether it would be possible to have the channel name text size, and fader lengths increased, as far as they can reasonably go (possibly as an optional thing) to make it easier to read which channel is which, and to accurately adjust the faders. I realise that partly it is a tradeoff for having 12 channels per layer, but I took a screen grab on my phone, and highlighted some ideas where some space could potentially be saved to maximise the available area for the channel names. Any increases in text size would be much appreciated! 

Thanks,

Steve

Hi! One of the things I really like about the Wing is that it supports a range of workflows. One thing that would help me, is if it were possible to use sends on fader to do bus to bus mixing. We have a bus for a livestream mix (I do have a reason to use a bus over a main in this instance!), and using sends on fader works great for everything, except for mixing in the FX (which I am using directly on busses, without return channels).

Currently, I have to select the FX bus to adjust the send from these to the stream mix (bus 1), which is a bit awkward as it then messes up the sends on fader by selecting the FX. What would be really handy is if I could select sends on fader for bus 1, and have the FX bus faders (bus 13-16) reflect the send to the stream bus (bus 1).

I realise that it is not something that can be enabled by default, as sends on fader for a bus works both for mixing channels to the bus, and the bus to a main or matrix. There would need to be some definition of which way the bus to bus mixing went.

This can be solved by adding an option in the setup menu, under the surface tab, to choose to have this off (default), or for the faders to control the sends to the selected bus, or for the faders to control the sends from the selected bus. It could be something like the picture here, to let you enable the feature and choose which direction you want it to work. 

Hello all 

I can't record the audio in my Presonus DAW

Deepmind6 is connected to my computer Windows 10/64 via usb cable direct. I have the two 1/4 connectors out from Deepmind into the front connection of die UMC 204 the I have midi out from DM6 to MIDI in on my interface. The interface is also directly hooked to my computer. Now I am not sure if I set up my DAW correctly I tried all kind of different ways but I can't get sound to record. 
hopefully this is enough info, thanks for reading!

Hello ! maybe you can help... I'm currently using the UCA 202 interface with the Xenyx X2442USB mixer. I mostly create drum cover videos but am looking more to record original music. my board feeds a laptop that is currently using audacity. Im looking for more channels into my laptop via usb. 4 channels needed is my minimum, eight is my max. I need to monitor drumless tracks or previously recorded tracks with a channel out of my laptop via usb at the same time as recording into my laptop via usb. The UCA 202 is perfect for this with its 2 in/ 2 out ,  would the U-PHORIA UMC404HD allow me to do this ? or is does it not have the "out of computer" in addition to the 4 into computer ? Also, I will be sub mixing Snare, kick, toms, cymbals and sending them by line out of the board into the interface. do the balanced mic inputs also work as line ins ? 

thank you very much !